These thoughts came to mind as I watched John Cox’s production of Massenet’s “Thaïs,” a vehicle for Renée Fleming and made available to millions around the world last week via the Met’s HD Live series.
Universal Theme not Illuminated by Costume Cabaret
Massenet’s libretto is based on a contemporary novel by Anatole France set in Alexandria, Egypt in the fourth century A.D. Cox has updated it to something close to our time, presumably, to clarify the universality of the story. Cox’s updating, however, is so haphazard that we end up losing our bearings completely.
Some characters in the Cox production appear to be dressed in costumes approximating fourth century Egypt, others in modern dress and still others seem to have grabbed whatever was left on the racks in the Met’s wardrobe department. Set and costume designer Paul Brown created a lavish world for his “Thaïs” - so lavish that one might think he had somehow benefited from all the billions of bucks flying around New York these days, as Wall Street investment houses run amok and the U.S. Treasury rushes to reimburse them!
Cox’s vision called for monumental sets requiring battalions of high-priced stage hands to move them around – Met HD Live generously showed us in great detail how it was all done – but in the end Cox could probably have achieved much more with a bare stage.
Gallet’s Libretto for Anatole France Novel Doesn’t Get it!
These observations notwithstanding, the basic problem with this opera, is that Louis Gallet’s libretto is dreadful. The story originally told by Anatole France has a monk Athanaël attempt to convert the courtesan Thaïs to a Christian life (i.e. enter a convent). No sooner has Athanaël achieved his goal, however, than he realizes that he lusts after the girl himself. Too late! He rushes back to the convent to declare himself, but Thaïs passes away in his presence without understanding or appreciating his declaration of love.
The tough part here is Thaïs’ conversion, and Gallet simply couldn’t figure out how to handle it. Without a convincing conversion, the opera really doesn’t work. Nor is there much in the libretto to enable the singer playing Athanaël to grow from religious obsession to earthly passion.
In an interview published in the Met HD Live Program Guide Thomas Hampson, singing Athanaël, articulated perfectly what it is all about: “It’s in the last scene, when Athanaël comes crashing into reality, that he probably blurts out the most self-examining line of the entire evening, right before she dies and (he) says, ‘It’s all a bunch of crap, it’s only about finding love in life – that’s the only thing that matters.’ ”
The problem lies in convincing the audience that this man Athanaël could really come to such a realization based on who he appeared to “be” earlier in the opera. The libretto doesn’t give him much to work with, and the director John Cox hasn’t offered much help to either Hampson, or Fleming in working out their characters. What he does do is throw in some pathetic Middle Eastern kitsch in the form of laughable belly dancing.
Unimaginative Direction Leaves Performers to Fend for Themselves!
A more imaginative director could have mirrored the motivations of the protagonists by means of projections, or perhaps some kind of dramatic tableau during the famous “Méditation,” beautifully played by concertmaster David Chan. Such elements could have been incorporated into a production still based in the fourth century, or even into a more abstract version. Cox just didn’t seem to be able to come with anything integrally creative.
The result was that Fleming and Hampson were left to fend for themselves. The direction, sets and costumes all seemed to be working against them. Fortunately, they both sang magnificently and for many opera fans that was more than enough. But why then bother spending all that money on sets and costumes?
Audience Yanked out of World of Thais with Backstage Biz!
Another factor that worked against one’s enjoyment – at least mine – was the way the opera was presented to the Met HD Live audience. The producer seems to feel that the audience needs to be looking at something interesting all the time; accordingly, we got to see every scene change in great detail, including all the sweating and some of the swearing too.
All this backstage business was engaging, perhaps, but it doesn’t belong in the live performance. After all, in any theatrical production, the curtain is lowered so that our ‘willing suspension of disbelief’ (Coleridge) is not utterly destroyed.
This Met HD Live producer apparently doesn’t understand that when there is music being played by the orchestra, as in the “Méditation” and the “Prelude” to Act Three, it is meant to express feelings related to the story, not to be an accompaniment to parts of sets being heaved about behind the curtain.
Finally, I could also have done without the breathless interviews done by Placido Domingo, as Fleming and Hampson either prepare to go on stage or as they are leaving the stage. This ‘between innings chatter’ may be alright for sports events but it again breaks the spell of the drama.
There is not much point in the artists suiting up as Thaïs and Athanaël if they are going to present themselves to the audience seconds later – still in costume and make-up - as, well, Fleming and Hampson.
Paul E. Robinson is the author of “Herbert von Karajan: the Maestro as Superstar” and “Sir Georg Solti: his Life and Music,” both available at http://www.amazon.com. For more about Paul E. Robinson please visit his website.






![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png)
3 users commented in " Met HD Live: Cox Thais Conversion Fails to Convict "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackYou are right one the $$, Mr. Robinson… The ONLY reason I wanted to ‘experience’ the dreck (wreck ?)of ‘Thais’ was to see/hear Renee F. and Thomas H, both in wonderful voice (and in body, i.e., Ms Fleming). But the scene changes were interminable and Noisy, the nuns’ habits straight from a high school ‘Sound of Music’, and some of the spear-carrier guards had bolt-action rifles and 19th century tunics!! Come one, HD Met, get it straight. I love the premise (and our arena-type theatre in Springfield OR had wonderful sound as well as perfect HD picture) but not the ‘filler’ material, and that goes for P. Domingo as well. Everybody knows who he is and what he has done (everything in Opera) but that night he just looked tired, or maybe embarrassed by Thais untimely, unconvincing ‘death’. At least Italian opera kills ‘em off with swords or knives or poison, but not just…Prayers! It would have been MUCH more exciting if Thais had expired during some athletic sex with our horny monk; give the scene a real ‘climax’, so to speak (heh heh). That opera needs some real Spice! And those burly stagehands should sing while they work, we see so much of them during the show…. Comments, opera buffs..?
Mr. Robinson, Sir, methinks you doth protest too much.
1) Have you read the background on the opera and the libretto?
2) Your complaint about the unconvincing nature of Thais’ conversion has some merit, but is negated, in my view, by your willful abdication of imagination.
I think:
3) You did not read the words of the libretto
4) You did not listen to the music
5) You projected your idea of what a ‘Conversion’ entailed onto the opera
6) There are enough suggestions in the libretto as it stands to suggest why
a) Thais was so eager to transfer her fealty to the life that Athanael offered her – just the Mirror Scene is sufficient to establish her state of mind, on the edge of a breakdown, in crisis, grasping for a way out of her situation where she was surrounded by crude people, afraid of mortality and the ephemeral nature of her beauty, and… Athanael offers her exactly what shee seeks… This coupled with the music itself, does delineate her state of mind…
b) Athanael, who clearly shows in ‘Voila, donc la terrible cite’ his lingering connection to the voluptuousness that he was born into (if there was any remaining doubt after his vision in the desert)…the music itself, pushing in its sweep of the grandeur that was Alexandria, is what he sings to, and what he evokes – why, he is but fighting against what he was born to do!
Etc etc.
I might point out that other much more qualified people have remarked upon the qualities of Thais and Massenet, in a convincingly positive way.
Just a couple of links:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/arts/music/07davi.html?ref=music
http://www.pov.bc.ca/thais1.html
Oh, BTW I watched the Live at the Met broadcast too – and for myself, at least, I found the ‘behind-the-curtain’ stuff very interesting. They were not in the least detracting from the ’suspension of disbelief’ that you required, perhaps because I mentally felt that I DID already suspend my disbelief in accepting that this was a staging, an opera, and HOW they managed the interplay of the scenes was, instead, an addition to my grasp of the spectacle that formed the theatrical realization of the piece that is called “Thais”.